Disappearing rent prompts lawsuit against Fort Collins firm

eRentPayment website

eRentPayment allows landlords to collect payments from tenants through its website. (Thomas Gounley)

Landlords are used to hearing “the check is in the mail.” But a handful of landlords are suing a Fort Collins payment processing firm after the rent checks got lost somewhere in cyberspace.

Boulder resident Ying Li, New York resident Todd Wasulko, Georgia resident Rasheda Mayner and Arizona resident Manish Singh filed suit against eRentPayment in Larimer County District Court in December.

The plaintiffs, all landlords who had tenants paying rent through the site, claim tenants paid using eRentPayments through its website but they never received their October rent payments.

They are seeking class-action status.

eRentPayment was founded in 2004, and charges a fee for transactions made through the site. In addition to facilitating rent payments, it provides other services like tenant background checks.

The lawsuit revolves around payments allegedly submitted by tenants using eRentPayment, but not received by the plaintiffs, between Oct. 3 and Oct. 17, 2017.

The plaintiffs initially assumed the payments were delayed, but ultimately concluded they were “lost forever due to the wrongful actions of eRent,” according to the lawsuit. They say they each are owed between $1,150 and $3,125.

The lawsuit says eRentPayment’s website “creates the impression” that it manages its payment-processing system, but actually contracted with a third party, which does business as eCheckit, for those operations.

eCheckit then contracted with another vendor, which does business as Check Commerce, to do the payment processing, according to the lawsuit.

In late September or October 2017, Check Commerce suspended eCheckit’s ability to process payments “due to alleged irregularities with the debit and credit instructions it was submitting on behalf of eRent and others,” according to the lawsuit. Check Commerce then froze all unsettled funds.

The lawsuit says the situation appears to have happened because eCheckit was “the victim of a hacking, data breach, fraud, or other wrongful act that resulted in the theft of potentially millions of dollars,” some of which were rent payments made through eRentPayment.

Hundreds, possibly thousands, of landlords did not receive rent payments made during the two-week period, according to the lawsuit.

eRentPayment is run by Rick Sands. The company did not respond to a request for comment.

In October, Sherrie Mills, a Denver realtor who owns investment properties, said she and her husband were missing $4,000 in rent because of eRentPayment.

Mills said this week that the couple ended up receiving the funds in late November, after tenants contacted their respective banks to dispute the payment as an “incomplete transaction.”

“It ended up taking hours of time, and the tenants honestly didn’t have to do it,” Mills said. “It wasn’t their problem.”

Mills said she no longer uses eRentPayment, and has been unable to find something comparable on the market. For now, she said, her tenants are sending her rent through Venmo.

eRentPayment website

eRentPayment allows landlords to collect payments from tenants through its website. (Thomas Gounley)

Landlords are used to hearing “the check is in the mail.” But a handful of landlords are suing a Fort Collins payment processing firm after the rent checks got lost somewhere in cyberspace.

Boulder resident Ying Li, New York resident Todd Wasulko, Georgia resident Rasheda Mayner and Arizona resident Manish Singh filed suit against eRentPayment in Larimer County District Court in December.

The plaintiffs, all landlords who had tenants paying rent through the site, claim tenants paid using eRentPayments through its website but they never received their October rent payments.

They are seeking class-action status.

eRentPayment was founded in 2004, and charges a fee for transactions made through the site. In addition to facilitating rent payments, it provides other services like tenant background checks.

The lawsuit revolves around payments allegedly submitted by tenants using eRentPayment, but not received by the plaintiffs, between Oct. 3 and Oct. 17, 2017.

The plaintiffs initially assumed the payments were delayed, but ultimately concluded they were “lost forever due to the wrongful actions of eRent,” according to the lawsuit. They say they each are owed between $1,150 and $3,125.

The lawsuit says eRentPayment’s website “creates the impression” that it manages its payment-processing system, but actually contracted with a third party, which does business as eCheckit, for those operations.

eCheckit then contracted with another vendor, which does business as Check Commerce, to do the payment processing, according to the lawsuit.

In late September or October 2017, Check Commerce suspended eCheckit’s ability to process payments “due to alleged irregularities with the debit and credit instructions it was submitting on behalf of eRent and others,” according to the lawsuit. Check Commerce then froze all unsettled funds.

The lawsuit says the situation appears to have happened because eCheckit was “the victim of a hacking, data breach, fraud, or other wrongful act that resulted in the theft of potentially millions of dollars,” some of which were rent payments made through eRentPayment.

Hundreds, possibly thousands, of landlords did not receive rent payments made during the two-week period, according to the lawsuit.

eRentPayment is run by Rick Sands. The company did not respond to a request for comment.

In October, Sherrie Mills, a Denver realtor who owns investment properties, said she and her husband were missing $4,000 in rent because of eRentPayment.

Mills said this week that the couple ended up receiving the funds in late November, after tenants contacted their respective banks to dispute the payment as an “incomplete transaction.”

“It ended up taking hours of time, and the tenants honestly didn’t have to do it,” Mills said. “It wasn’t their problem.”

Mills said she no longer uses eRentPayment, and has been unable to find something comparable on the market. For now, she said, her tenants are sending her rent through Venmo.

Your subscription has expired. Renew now by choosing a subscription below!

For more informaiton, head over to your profile.

Profile


SUBSCRIBE NOW

 — 

 — 

 — 

TERMS OF SERVICE:

ALL MEMBERSHIPS RENEW AUTOMATICALLY. YOU WILL BE CHARGED FOR A 1 YEAR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL AT THE RATE IN EFFECT AT THAT TIME UNLESS YOU CANCEL YOUR MEMBERSHIP BY LOGGING IN OR BY CONTACTING [email protected].

ALL CHARGES FOR MONTHLY OR ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS ARE NONREFUNDABLE.

EACH MEMBERSHIP WILL ONLY FUNCTION ON UP TO 3 MACHINES. ACCOUNTS ABUSING THAT LIMIT WILL BE DISCONTINUED.

FOR ASSISTANCE WITH YOUR MEMBERSHIP PLEASE EMAIL [email protected]




Return to Homepage

POSTED IN Commercial Real Estate

Editor's Picks

5 responses to “Disappearing rent prompts lawsuit against Fort Collins firm”

  1. We’re a firm in San Diego with a property in Los Angeles. eRentPayment owes us $5,300 since October and repeatedly says they’re “working on it” when I inquire about our missing funds. They never give us updates without us pinging them for results. I’d love to get the name & contact info of the plaintiffs’ attorney so we can possibly join the suit. We’d also like the contact info for eRentPayment’s attorney or eRentPayment’s contact info for service of process for an individual lawsuit.

  2. Reporter. The plaintiffs are represented by Ian T. Hicks of The Law Office of Ian T. Hicks in Denver. I don’t have contact info for eRentPayment beyond the info on its website, or the name of the company’s attorney.

  3. How do I get in touch with the plaintiffs of the lawsuit against erentpayment? I have lost money to erentpayment as well.

  4. I just found out that there will be a class action on this. I emailed [email protected] my information to get on as a plaintiff. We were shorted $1,950 in rent and erentpayment has been nothing but uncooperative since it happened.

  5. Thanks Chad! I lost $ too and just emailed this address… We will see if that leads anywhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *